User talk:Xcia0069

Jump to navigation Jump to search

About this board

Logo of Wikidata

Welcome to Wikidata, Xcia0069!

Wikidata is a free knowledge base that you can edit! It can be read and edited by humans and machines alike and you can go to any item page now and add to this ever-growing database!

Need some help getting started? Here are some pages you can familiarize yourself with:

  • Introduction – An introduction to the project.
  • Wikidata tours – Interactive tutorials to show you how Wikidata works.
  • Community portal – The portal for community members.
  • User options – including the 'Babel' extension, to set your language preferences.
  • Contents – The main help page for editing and using the site.
  • Project chat – Discussions about the project.
  • Tools – A collection of user-developed tools to allow for easier completion of some tasks.

If you have any questions, please ask me on [[User talk:|my talk page]]. If you want to try out editing, you can use the sandbox to try. Once again, welcome, and I hope you quickly feel comfortable here, and become an active editor for Wikidata.

Best regards! --Tobias1984 (talk) 14:02, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

Previous discussion was archived at User talk:Xcia0069/Archive 1 on 2017-03-03.

MediaWiki message delivery (talkcontribs)

Hello Vunj8o8mzw7cuk9z,

Really sorry for the inconvenience. This is a gentle note to request that you check your email. We sent you a message titled "The Community Insights survey is coming!". If you have questions, email surveys@wikimedia.org.

You can see my explanation here.


Reply to "We sent you an e-mail"
Multichill (talkcontribs)

Hi Xcia0069, please don't remove valid statements like you did on The Martyrdom of St Januarius in the Amphitheatre at Pozzuoli (Q3947174). Wikidata is not Wikipedia. We don't just document the current state of paintings, but also provenance. In this case the paintings was in the collection for quite some time. You probably want to add some qualifiers if you figure out what the full provenance is.

Xcia0069 (talkcontribs)

Sure, good point. I was not quite sure how to do it, but I see you have already changed it. Bedankt!

Multichill (talkcontribs)

It can be a big puzzle. What you can do if you don't know when it entered and left the collection is to qualify it with start time decade/century/unknown and end time decade/century/unknown.

Reply to "Please qualify, don't remove"

Thank you for participating in the FindingGLAMs Challenge!

1
Alicia Fagerving (WMSE) (talkcontribs)
Thank you for participating in the FindingGLAMs Challenge!
By improving information about GLAM institutions on Wikidata, you made the Wikimedia projects better for everyone!
Reply to "Thank you for participating in the FindingGLAMs Challenge!"
Marsupium (talkcontribs)
Jane023 (talkcontribs)

Yes you can take a look at some exhibitions that have been done. Basically exhibitions generally have catalogs, so they can be treated like any other catalog. That said, I have also use P608 for photographers who were in a photo exhibition. So you can do both too.

Jane023 (talkcontribs)
Xcia0069 (talkcontribs)

Ah, I see. For some stupid reason, I had not thought of using the catalogue as the main point of reference (as opposed to the exhibition). Your approach makes sense

Jane023 (talkcontribs)

Since the catalogue has all the metadata I generally just create one item for the exhibition and the catalog, since they are also pretty much similar in time and place (various language versions are published by each museum if the exhibition travels to other countries). Some people make two items: one for the exhibition and one for the catalogue. That's fine too. So eg if you are reading about some artwork that was in some exhibition but you don't know the catalog number but want to record that little fact, go ahead and make an item for the exhibition and make a statement on the artwork based on "exhibition history". You can always add a catalog code later if you ever get around to it (or someone else can too).

Marsupium (talkcontribs)

Please please make two items! They are conceptually different, there aren't things in the world that are an instance of an exhibition and an exhibition catalogue at the same time. We should still discuss this with a broader audience I think!

Jane023 (talkcontribs)

Well I see it in the same way as "Museum building/Museum organization" or "Altarpiece/Painting series". If it doesn't exist yet, make one item for your needs and the next person who needs the other thing can come along and split them up. There is no need to make it more difficult than it already is to make items.

Marsupium (talkcontribs)

Yes, I see. For this and the "Museum building/Museum organization" thing I'd nevertheless also always recommend to create two items (in cases where there isn't yet a Wikipedia introduced merged cluster) because often it will be more work with splitting them up later, especially with exhibitions and museums which both are object in a lot of statements. But now it is what it is.

Jane023 (talkcontribs)

I like to think of myself forging my way through the Wikidata wilderness, hacking away at strange vines and clearing a little pathway. After me, others can come build roads, install electricity grids, schools and electoral voting machines...

Marsupium (talkcontribs)
) Haha! That's great, of course it's always a question of priorities and nothing will ever be perfect here!
Xcia0069 (talkcontribs)
Jane023 (talkcontribs)
Xcia0069 (talkcontribs)
Jane023 (talkcontribs)

I tried using your query directly in the query editor and it said there was an error, so I just copied the query from another catalog and changed the catalog item number and then it did work. Sometimes the query can be squirrely. It works now though and thanks for your work on this. Happy listeria-watching!

Marsupium (talkcontribs)

The closing "}" was commented out … Cheers, m.

Reply to "Exhibitions"
There are no older topics