Property talk:P7153
Documentation
significant or notable places associated with the subject
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P7153#allowed qualifiers, SPARQL
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P7153#mandatory qualifier, SPARQL
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P7153#Scope, SPARQL
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P7153#Entity types
Qualifiers - adding "applies to part"[edit]
I've added "applies to part" as a qualifier as I see no reason it shouldn't be allowed. I am modelling relationships between real estate and the people that donated parts of it, and need to specify which parts. Happy to be educated if that's inappropriate. DrThneed (talk) 03:26, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Use of significant place (P7153) in archaeological periods?[edit]
I used significant place (P7153) to link from an archaeological period to its type site (so Ubaid period (Q245156) has significant place Tell al-'Ubaid (Q1317854), with object has role (P3831) type site (Q3247173). Now, if I wanted to link from Ubaid period to other major (non-type) sites for that period (for example Eridu (Q210065) or Tell Abada (Q56300816), is there another appropriate statement that I could use with P3831? Zoeperkoe (talk) 14:20, 8 December 2021 (UTC)